EO Sterilization Challenges
- EO is under regulatory pressure from FDA and EPA
- Recent litigation has increased risk profile of EO sterilization
- Slow turnaround times
- Expensive emissions scrubbing costs
- EO processing costs are increasing dramatically due to regulation:
- Emission standards require costly facility upgrades
- Closure of contractor EO processing facilities
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0607a/0607a51303a9072d8d8326a287d56f555b10675c" alt="smokestack"
Solutions
- Shorter turnaround times – (measured in hours not days)
- Environmentally friendly solution – recipient of EPA Green Chemistry Award
- FDA Challenge Grant I recipient
- Cost effective – operating costs less expensive than ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization
- Broadly compatible with biomaterials
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f1c0/3f1c0535eef71f08047af1ce0d121b9a3257a0de" alt="fda-logo-blue-large-01"
Success Stories
FDA Story
- Agency looking to broaden commercial use of EO alternative sterilization modalities
- Selected as one of 4 Innovation Challenge Grant recipients
- Bimonthly meetings with the FDA to streamline the adoption rate of scCO2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7db42/7db4257e9159a4d414f08b57c64d7455dd9a07a1" alt="green-technology"
NovaSterilis Provides
- Multiple regulatory clearances received